If the garden is the best thing about your home, it's natural to want buyers to see it in full bloom. So as winter closes in, you might be wondering whether to hold off until spring.
I've done over 800 free consultations with home sellers over the last couple of years, and I had this exact conversation recently. Ruth (not her real name) is selling a characterful stone-built village house, and its large, mature garden is the star of the show.
Her first attempt last year ran for five months without a single viewing. Now she wanted to know whether to relaunch straight after Christmas, or wait until the daffodils come out in late February. I've changed some details to protect her privacy.
She left the call with a clear answer on the timing, and a plan to make sure next year is the year the house sells.
Waiting until spring to sell a house with a beautiful garden usually costs more than it gains, especially for a one-off home with few buyers. The market keeps moving in winter, and competing homes look just as bare. Launching sooner, with fresh photos in spring if needed, gives the right buyer more chances to find it.
But the reasoning matters more than the verdict, because the answer turns on how many buyers a home like Ruth's actually has. Here's how it played out.
If you'd rather skip to the prescription, Ruth's call ended with our own accelerated sale service, where my team and I run the whole sale for you. On calls like hers, I only suggest it to around one in three sellers.
1. Ruth's situation: a one-off home with no viewings
Here's where Ruth was when we spoke in late October:
- A one-off village home.
A characterful stone-built detached house with four bedrooms, in a small East Midlands village. There isn't another one quite like it, so it's hard to value, and the buyer for it is rare. - A garden that's the star feature.
It's large and mature, and it's the thing most likely to win a buyer over once they're through the door. - A move with a deadline.
Ruth's in her late seventies, and since her partner sadly passed away the summer before last, the house is far too much for one. She wants to downsize near her daughter, around half an hour away, and be settled there before next winter. - Five months, and not a single viewing.
Last year the house was on the market from spring into early autumn, with an agent based miles away. The only feedback was that it's "a niche property". - Lower valuations this time.
Earlier valuations came in at £800,000 to £900,000. This autumn, two local agents said the high £700,000s, and she'd accept around £740,000 for a quicker, more certain move. - Advice pulling both ways.
Some people told her Boxing Day is a great time to launch, and one agent suggested modern auction if all else fails.
Underneath the timing question sat a bigger one: how do you make sure next year is the year it actually sells, without the price sliding below what she's happy with?
So before we can judge whether to wait for spring, we have to be clear about why last year's sale went nowhere.
2. Why last year's sale went nowhere
A one-off home like Ruth's has a smaller, rarer pool of buyers, and they're harder to find. Last year, it wasn't put in front of enough of them. In my opinion, the gap was marketing, not the season or the garden, because homes nearby are selling and last year's listing ran right through the summer.
Homes sell on the best presentation, the best promotion and the best price. Presentation and promotion get the right buyers seeing a home at its best. Price makes it the best deal once they do.
Here's how Ruth's home measured up:
- Presentation wasn't the gap.
The home has bags of charm, and even with the garden at its best last summer, nobody came to view. - Promotion was.
A rare buyer has to be found, and last time the home was marketed by an agent based miles away. - The price needs fresh evidence.
The valuations have come down, and a one-off home is hard to value.
Which brings us to the question Ruth actually asked...
3. Should you wait until spring to sell your house?
This was the question Ruth came with, and one a lot of sellers ask at this time of year.
For a home with few buyers, waiting until spring mostly means missing the ones who turn up in winter. The market doesn't shut down when the weather turns, and every month off the market is a month that can't produce a buyer. The garden's winter disadvantage is shared by every competing home, and it can be fixed later.
Here's why I told Ruth to get on with it.
3.1. Does the market really shut down for winter?
Let me concede what's true first. There are peaks and troughs through the year, and spring is one of the busier times. A garden in bloom also photographs far better than one in January.
But the winter dip is much smaller than most people think. When I've looked at the Land Registry's transaction data, the troughs are still about 80% as high as the peaks.
In my experience, there are only about ten genuinely dead days in the year, from around the middle of December to Christmas. Then Boxing Day is usually one of the busiest days of the year for people browsing homes.
Rightmove reported its busiest Boxing Day ever in December 2025, with visits nearly doubling from Christmas Day.
So a winter launch isn't a launch into an empty market. But for Ruth, the bigger question is who's in it...
3.2. Why a rare buyer makes waiting expensive
Ruth's home is more rural, more unique and more expensive than average, so the buyer for it is rare, and harder to find.
The right buyer for a home like this might only come to the market about once a month, and nobody knows which month.
If Ruth waits until late February, she misses everyone who starts looking in the meantime. A house that isn't listed can't be found, so every month off the market is a month that can't produce her buyer.
On the market, she has a seriously decent chance of catching one of them before spring starts.
And time matters more for Ruth than most. She wants to be settled before next winter, and even a buyer who's found still has to get through to completion. So months spent waiting come straight out of a limited window.
3.3. How to sell a house with a garden in winter
That leaves the garden itself, and I understand why it weighs on Ruth's mind. But I don't think it justifies holding off, for two reasons:
- The playing field is level.
The other homes her buyer views in winter will be damp too, with no leaves on the trees. Every competing garden has the same winter handicap. - The agent can paint the picture.
A good agent can help buyers imagine the garden in summer. We've just not seen winter hurt sales that much.
And if Ruth's still looking for a buyer come March or April, the photographer comes back for fresh photos of the garden in bloom.
So waiting for spring was off the table. But one local agent had floated a very different way to speed things up: modern auction, if all else fails...
3.4. Would auction or modern auction be the answer?
Selling at auction would typically leave a home like Ruth's with around 10 to 15% less than a well-run open-market sale. That's the achieved price, not the fees. Worse, a home with few buyers, put into a process most buyers can't use, has a high chance of not selling at all.
On a home worth around £770,000, that's something like £75,000 to £115,000 less, for two reasons:
- Fewer buyers.
Most people can't buy at auction, or don't want to, so there's less competition to push the price up. - Bargain hunters.
The people who do buy at auction are usually there because they want a bargain.
But the bigger problem is the buyer pool. A home like Ruth's already has a small one. Put it into a process most of those buyers can't take part in, and there's a really high chance nobody's there for it at all.
Best case, it sells and she loses a lot of money. Most likely, I think, it doesn't sell, and she's lost months she doesn't have before next winter.
For me, the deciding factor on traditional auction is usually mortgageability, and Ruth's home can get a mortgage.
So why would an agent suggest modern auction? Simply put, it's because it's good for the agent. They typically take around half the auction fee for the introduction, so whenever a seller asks for a faster sale, many are trained to suggest it.
I've recorded a full breakdown of modern auction, and recorded a case study about another real consultation where it was being pushed by an agent.
Auction wasn't right for Ruth, but traditional auction does suit some homes. My free 60-second quiz will tell you if yours is one. If it is, I'll introduce you to an auction house I know and trust. If not, I'll suggest what I'd do instead.
Hit the button below to get started:
So auction was out too, which left two last checks before the prescription...
3.5. The last checks before the prescription
First, the local market. Agents nearly always blame the market when a home doesn't sell, so I always check how it's actually doing.
Within a few miles of Ruth's, around 45 homes were for sale in a broad price band either side of hers. Over a third already had sales agreed. Around the country we see anywhere from 10% to 50%, so this is a market that's moving, and a better-run sale has every reason to find her buyer.
Second, the quick-sale companies. Ruth had binned all the letters from companies offering to buy her house, and rightly so.
Having worked in and around these companies for over ten years, I know the genuine ones pay around 80% of market value. On a home worth around £770,000, that's an offer of around £615,000. That's roughly £155,000 less, and well below the £740,000 or so she'd accept.
In practice, I'd expect even worse though.
These house-buying companies want cookie-cutter homes that are quick to resell, so a one-off stone house would very possibly get no offer at all, or one something like 40% lower. My guide to how much house-buying companies really pay explains the numbers.
These companies suit people who value speed, certainty and convenience far more than price, and that is not most sellers. When someone books a call with me looking at house-buying companies, I end up suggesting a different route about 97% of the time. My guide to house-buying companies covers the whole category.
Ruth didn't need to exchange within weeks, so that left the open market, run properly this time. My guide to the best way to sell a house compares every route.
4. The plan: how our service would run Ruth's sale
Ruth wanted a balance of speed and price, with more certainty and less hassle than last time. That's what our accelerated sale service is built for. For her sale, it means getting the home seen by far more of the right buyers, pricing it from evidence, then winning that rare buyer and getting the sale to completion.
Ruth's first question was how that works with estate agents. We use them for the one thing they do best: tapping into the local market. They work under us, and for everything else we follow our own process.
She also asked what we do differently. There's no single magic trick. It's a hundred small things done differently, which all stack up to a very different result.
Here's how the service would tackle Ruth's problems:
- Price it from evidence, not hope.
The problem: a one-off home is hard to value, and Ruth's valuations have already slid from £800,000 to £900,000 down to the high £700,000s.
How: we push the agents for evidence of what similar homes sold for, then do our own analysis. The aim is a realistic price arrived at from evidence (rather than hope, or pessimism).
Why it matters: Rightmove's July 2026 figures show homes that need a price reduction spend an average of around 127 days on the market, against 36 days for those priced right first time. Overpricing doesn't make you more money. It just costs you time, and Ruth's window before next winter is limited. - Get it in front of far more of the right buyers.
The problem: five months with one distant agent produced no viewings. Ruth's instinct was that everything's on Rightmove anyway.
How: on our own sales, the property portals account for only around 30% of sales. The other 70% come from proactive work, like agents ringing their buyer databases and cross-selling to people who've viewed similar homes. So we choose agents who are selling homes like this nearby, and have the best two marketing it at once.
The result: 95% of our clients who follow our advice get viewings in the first week. For a rare buyer, that's the difference between hoping they spot the listing and making sure they hear about it. - Negotiate hard when the offer lands.
The problem: with a rare buyer, there may only be one serious offer, so how it's negotiated decides the price.
How: we negotiate directly with buyers, qualify them properly, and agree terms with deadlines. If an agent on a 1% fee gets you an extra £10,000, that's £100 to their firm, and the person negotiating won't see a penny of it. On all our own sales (100+ of them), that £10,000 was our profit, so we got really good at pushing buyers to their best price. - Keep the sale together through to completion.
The next problem: once a buyer's found, the risk changes. Rightmove's July 2026 figures put the average wait from sale agreed to completion at 154 days. A lot can go wrong in five months, and Ruth's own purchase near her daughter depends on a chain holding together.
How: we coordinate the whole chain and head off the problems that kill sales before they land. On an older building, the survey will come back with things, and some buyers will chance it for a few thousand off. An agent isn't too bothered if you lose £10,000 there, but for us it was our profit, so we got good at defending the price agreed.
The result: our sales fall through three to four times less often than estate agent sales.
How long would it take? When I sold my own properties, I averaged 105 days from start to finish. That's about twice as fast as the average of more than seven months in those same Rightmove figures.
I don't expect Ruth's to be that quick, given the challenges. But however long it would take going direct through agents, I'd fully expect it to be faster with us.
What no service can do, ours included, is make a rare buyer appear sooner. What it can do is make sure that when they appear, they find the home, pay a good price, and get through to completion.
The catch? We're more expensive than an estate agent, although it's no sale, no fee, and she can leave at any time at no cost. Nobody ever knows what their home would have sold for without us, so I'd rather Ruth judged it on speed, certainty and peace of mind.
That list is only the part of a sale you can see. What usually decides the outcome is the hundred smaller problems along the way, including the ones Ruth hasn't hit yet.
5. Where Ruth got to
Ruth left the call with the timing answered: get on with it, rather than waiting until late February, and be on the market looking great and widely marketed.
She's now weighing up having us run the sale, with a follow-up call booked for the following week.
Waiting for spring had felt like the safe choice, but the facts pointed the other way:
- A rare buyer.
The right person for a one-off home could turn up in any month, and a house that isn't listed can't meet them. - A limited window.
Ruth wants to be settled before next winter, so every month spent waiting comes out of it. - A market that keeps moving.
The quietest months still run at about 80% of the busiest, and over a third of her competition had sales agreed. - A level playing field.
Every competing garden looks bare in winter too, and fresh photos can follow in spring.
The garden can have its moment in the spring photos. The sale shouldn't wait for it.
If your own home has a rare buyer and you're wondering when to launch, my free consultations are a proper one-to-one call with me. We'll work through your situation together, and you'll leave with a specific plan, the same way Ruth did.
Thanks for reading!
Frequently asked questions
By Matthew Cooper, Co-Founder of Home Selling Expert






